What AI consulting looks like when engineers do it
Most AI consulting starts with a discovery phase and ends in a strategy document. Someone interviews your team, writes up a readiness assessment, and hands you a roadmap for a build that someone else will do later, if it happens at all.
We run it the other way. One working session to understand the business and the constraint, then we build a free, working prototype of the thing you are considering. You click through it. You approve it, or you tell us what is wrong and we change it. That prototype is the consulting: it shows you, in software, whether the idea holds up before either of us commits to a build.
If the recommendation is a build, the same team that built the prototype becomes the pod that ships it. There is no handoff to a different vendor, no re-scoping, no second sales cycle.
Where AI is worth building and where it is not
A real consulting relationship includes telling you when you do not need what you came in asking for. If the task is generic, drafting text, summarizing a public document, a feature already inside a tool you pay for will do the job for less than any consulting engagement costs.
A custom build earns its cost under three conditions: the value comes from data nobody else has, your workflow does not match what a generic SaaS tool assumes, or you have a compliance requirement, a signed BAA, an audit log, data that cannot leave your infrastructure, that a horizontal product cannot meet. If none of those apply, we will say so on the first call rather than in month three.
We are also honest about scale. A five-year, single-product engineering hire is a different problem than a scoped build, and a modernization program spanning a dozen departments and hundreds of engineers calls for a different kind of firm than a pod. We tell you which situation you are in.
From audit to production in one team
An engagement usually opens with an audit: a forward-deployed engineer looks at your workflow, maps the hours and cost of what is being done manually, and ranks what is worth automating with an expected saving attached. That is the assessment work most firms sell as a standalone deliverable.
Ours ends in a working prototype of the top candidate, not a memo. From there the same engineers keep going: data ingestion built to your schema, a model layer you can swap or run offline, an evaluation suite that catches regressions before your customers do, and a deploy pipeline that ships into your own repository from week one.
That is also how we handle an AI pilot someone already built. We will look at what exists, tell you plainly whether the architecture holds up, and either extend it or replace the parts that will not survive production, instead of restarting the project to justify a new statement of work.
What it costs and who is in the room
Pricing is published, not quoted after a sales call. A Builder Pod is $7,500 a month: one active build track, a pod lead plus a two-engineer bench, weekly ship, month-to-month with 30 days notice. A Growth Pod is $10,000 a month: two concurrent tracks, a pod lead plus a three-engineer bench, weekly ship plus a bi-weekly strategy call. Enterprise engagements, three or more parallel tracks with a dedicated senior lead, are scoped in a meeting because the shape varies too much for a single number.
There is no hourly billing and no change orders. You are billed for capacity. The people doing the consulting, the pod lead and the engineers, are the same people who write the code, so there is no gap between the recommendation and the person accountable for building it.